Politicians at ESRB Again …

Posted by Dyna-Storm in Game & Gadget Stuff on November 30th, 2007

Phoenix WrightI tell you one thing, these guys just wouldn’t give up. I just read another article posted by Gamespot about politicians giving ESRB (Entertainment Software Rating Board) another round of hoo-hah. If you are too lazy the read, I will just give you a quick summary. The politicians wanted ESRB to reconsider their way of rating games, especially on the Nintendo Wii due to it’s motion sensing wiimote. The argument they give is that, games such as Manhunt 2 allows the player to ‘act’ out the killing moves thus promoting bad influence.

To be honest I’m getting a bit fed up seeing the issue being repeated over and over again. I don’t know, are people’s brain sometimes too stubborn or they are too ignorant to take game ratings seriously? It’s a game meant to be played by a person whose age is 17 and above, NOT some 10 year old! Give me a break! Why do they keep emphasizing that children will be involved???

“That system permits children to act out each of the many graphic torture scenes and murders in Manhunt 2 rather than simply manipulating a game pad,” the senators wrote. “This led one clinical psychologist to state that the realistic motions used with the Wii mean that ‘You’re basically teaching a child the behavioral sequencing of killing.’ While this was not cited as the reason for the BBFC decision, we do believe that the ESRB should take the Wii Remote controller, and future advances in game controllers, which create more realistic gaming environments, into consideration.”

Please, for God’s sake somebody tell these politicians that a 17 year old isn’t a child!

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

5 Comments to “Politicians at ESRB Again …”

  1. Nick Leong | November 30th, 2007 at 10:40 am

    Yes, censor them! Age limit 21 and above! :P

    Then maybe it will cut down on the number of annoying American teens playing online :P

  2. Dyna-Storm | November 30th, 2007 at 10:44 am

    Lol I seriously wonder why they don’t want to put 18 or 21 and above. Feels like as if all the american teens going to stay 17 forever …

  3. Khilly | November 30th, 2007 at 11:41 am

    The politicians is just acting according to the masses. I’m sure 20-40 years down the road when the current “17″ year old teenagers grow up, they might just forget about all this.

  4. Deimos Tel`Arin | November 30th, 2007 at 11:58 am

    Perhaps the said politician’s mum always refer him as “Boy” after all these years?

    The saying goes “A children no matter how big they have grown and age will always be a child in their parents’ eyes.” However, all this talk of “child” in that article is just bull dung.

    Anyway, the so called ERSB rating is useless. Adults can still purchase the game and let the minors play.

    Minors who have “1337″ internet skills are able to obtain digital copies of the game off the world wide web.

    In the end, it is all those problematic minors that are giving games and fellow gamers a bad name.

    Cheers!

  5. Dyna-Storm | November 30th, 2007 at 12:06 pm

    Thus I always wondered why the blame was never placed on the parents who allow minors to play or the children themselves.

    Guess if the politicians put the blame on parents, they wouldn’t be getting much votes in the next election

    Typical …

Leave a Comment

Quicktags: